• <noscript id="y4y0w"><source id="y4y0w"></source></noscript>
    <table id="y4y0w"><option id="y4y0w"></option></table>
  • <li id="y4y0w"></li>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"></noscript>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"><kbd id="y4y0w"></kbd></noscript>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"><source id="y4y0w"></source></noscript>
    <menu id="y4y0w"></menu>
    <table id="y4y0w"><rt id="y4y0w"></rt></table>
  • 強化針鐵礦法除鐵的研究現狀和進展

    Research progress of enhanced iron removal by the goethite process

    • 摘要: 濕法煉鋅浸出液中鐵的去除是一道重要的工序,這是因為電積時鐵離子會在電極上發生氧化還原,造成陰極鋅的反溶、陽極腐蝕、降低電流效率和增加能耗,嚴重影響電積工藝. 針鐵礦法除鐵具有渣量少、易過濾、稀貴金屬損失低等優點,沉淀生成的針鐵礦渣(α-FeOOH)不含S元素,從源頭減少雜質元素,使鐵水預處理工藝降低處理難度,只需提高渣中鐵含量就可作為煉鐵原料,因此是目前主流的除鐵方法. 但針鐵礦法除鐵存在反應時間長、晶型混雜不穩定以及渣中鐵含量低等難題,導致實際工業應用效果不佳. 針對上述問題,本文以氧化、水解和中和三個針鐵礦法除鐵過程的形成環節為結構框架,綜述了強化改善針鐵礦法除鐵效率的方法,如氧壓水熱法、常規氧化法、剪切強化法、晶種誘導法、反應器控制和中和劑優化法等,系統分析了各種方法的原理、現狀、優缺點. 氧壓水熱法依據亨利定律提高氧分壓促進氣體分子的溶解,該法可顯著提高反應速率和渣中鐵品位,但對設備要求高;常規氧化法通常在低溫常壓環境中進行,主要通過加入各種添加劑,使除鐵過程發揮高效率、高效果,因此該法操作簡便,但高度依賴氧化劑性能;剪切強化法以施加剪切力來改變溶液體系環境,使離子流動狀態改變,增加各反應物接觸幾率,從而改善傳質,提升效率,但對環境適應性差;晶種誘導法是應用最廣泛和成熟的方法,通過提供生長模板和降低成核能壘,在不滿足過飽和的條件下,可定向調控晶體結構,提高鐵去除率,但晶種循環回收技術及其穩定性受到制約;反應器智能控制技術有望實現工藝參數的精準調控,將其作為輔助條件有利于高效生產、解放人力、提高經濟效益,但目前對實際溶液理論機理的研究仍然模糊,對建立除鐵的完整理論體系仍待研究;中和劑優化法可以減少資源浪費、降低成本、減少后續處理難度,但對操作條件極為嚴格,關鍵的難點是對pH的動態變化調節. 最后,本文提出強化針鐵礦法研究思路和想法,并展望了強化針鐵礦法除鐵新方向.

       

      Abstract: The removal of iron from zinc hydrometallurgical leaching solutions is a critical process. This is because iron ions are oxidized and reduced on the electrode during electrowinning, resulting in the reverse dissolution of cathode zinc, anode corrosion, reduction in current efficiency, and an increase in energy consumption, which severely affects the electrowinning process. Iron removal using the goethite method has the advantages of less slag, easy filtration, and low loss of rare and precious metals. The goethite slag (α-FeOOH) formed by precipitation does not contain the sulfur element, which can reduce impurity elements from the source and decrease the difficulty of pretreatment of molten iron in steelmaking. It can be used as an ironmaking raw material only by increasing the iron content of slag. Therefore, it is currently the mainstream iron removal method. However, iron removal by the goethite method has the problems of long processing time, mixed crystal instability, and low iron content in slag, resulting in poor practical industrial application. Given these problems, this study considers the three goethite iron removal formation processes of oxidation, hydrolysis, and neutralization as the structural framework and summarizes the methods to strengthen and improve the iron removal efficiency of the goethite method, such as the oxygen pressure hydrothermal, conventional oxidation, shear strengthening, seed induction, reactor control, and neutralizer optimization methods. The principles, current state, advantages, and disadvantages of various methods are systematically analyzed. The oxygen pressure hydrothermal method is based on Henry’s law to increase the oxygen partial pressure to promote the dissolution of gas molecules. This method can significantly increase the reaction rate and the iron content of slag but requires substantial equipment. The conventional oxidation method is usually conducted in an environment of low temperature and normal pressure, primarily through a combination of various additives to make the iron removal process highly efficient and effective. Therefore, this method is simple to operate but is highly dependent on the performance of the oxidant. The shear strengthening method changes the solution system environment by applying shear force, changes the ion flow state, increases the contact probability, and improves mass transfer efficiency; however, it has poor environmental adaptability. Seed induction is the most widely used and mature method. By providing growth templates and reducing the nucleation energy barrier, the method enables the crystal structure to be directionally regulated, and the iron removal rate can be improved when supersaturation is not satisfied. However, the seed recycling technology and stability are restricted. The intelligent control technology of the reactor is expected to realize precise control of the process parameters. As an auxiliary condition, it is conducive to efficient production, liberating manpower and improving economic benefits. However, research on the theoretical mechanism of the actual solution remains uncertain, and the establishment of a complete theoretical system for iron removal must be studied. The neutralization agent optimization method can reduce the waste of resources, cost, and the difficulty of subsequent treatments. However, the operating conditions are very strict, and the most critical difficulty is adjusting the dynamic change in pH. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to overcome these limitations, provide ideas for subsequent research on strengthening the goethite method, and suggest a new direction for iron removal by strengthening the goethite method.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
  • <noscript id="y4y0w"><source id="y4y0w"></source></noscript>
    <table id="y4y0w"><option id="y4y0w"></option></table>
  • <li id="y4y0w"></li>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"></noscript>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"><kbd id="y4y0w"></kbd></noscript>
    <noscript id="y4y0w"><source id="y4y0w"></source></noscript>
    <menu id="y4y0w"></menu>
    <table id="y4y0w"><rt id="y4y0w"></rt></table>
  • 啪啪啪视频